The string appears to contain literal backslash-n characters? Actually repr shows \n which in repr means actual newline. But earlier cat -A showed the lines have trailing spaces? Let me look again: cat -A output showed <li>$ — meaning two spaces before <li>. But the repr shows \n<li>\n <p class=\"eyebrow\"> — no two spaces before <li> and 12 spaces before <p>. Hmm, the earlier sed showed <li>$ without leading spaces? Actually sed showed:
Looking at the sed output again:
Hmm wait, that was sed -n '52,58p', which showed <li>$ with two leading spaces and <p with 14 spaces. But the python repr from find shows \n<li>\n <p class — two fewer spaces each. That suggests the file has DIFFERENT indentation at the find location vs sed line range... Wait no — the sed output lines start with <main>$ without leading spaces. The read_write_file tool earlier showed <main> with 4 spaces. The difference: the read tool's display adds its own formatting? Actually the read tool shows content after contents: |- with a 2-space yaml indent. So real content for line 52 is <main>.
The python repr gives the authoritative truth: \n<li>\n <p class="eyebrow">2026-08-19</p>. So <li> at column 0, and <p> with 12 spaces. But sed showed <li>$ with 2 spaces?? That's contradictory. Unless... sed output also went through the tool's display wrapper which adds 2 spaces to each line. Yes! The tool stdout display itself is indented by 2 spaces (the stdout: |- YAML block). So real file: <li> at col 0, <p> with 12 spaces, <h3> with 12 spaces, etc.
So my anchor should be <li>\n <p class="eyebrow">2026-08-19</p>. Let me redo with the correct indentation.